Honda’s $632,500 Fine: A Wake-Up Call for Privacy Compliance

Honda’s $632,500 Fine: A Wake-Up Call for Privacy Compliance
Photo by emrecan arık / Unsplash

On March 12, 2025, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) announced a landmark settlement with American Honda Motor Co. (Honda) over alleged violations of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The automaker agreed to pay a $632,500 fine and implement sweeping changes to its privacy practices after being found in violation of several key CCPA provisions. This enforcement action serves as a stark reminder to companies that privacy compliance is not just a checkbox exercise.

Key Allegations Against Honda

The CPPA’s investigation uncovered multiple violations of Californians’ privacy rights, including:

  • Excessive Information Requirements: Honda required consumers to provide up to eight fields of personal information—including name, address, email, phone number, and vehicle identification number (VIN)—to exercise their privacy rights. This practice violated CCPA regulations, which prohibit businesses from requiring identity verification for opt-out requests related to data sales or sharing[1][7][12].
  • Symmetry in Privacy Choices: Honda’s online privacy management tool made opting out of data sales or sharing more cumbersome than opting in. For example, opting into data sharing required just one click, while opting out involved multiple steps. This asymmetrical design violated Section 7004(a)(2) of the CCPA Regulations[3][8][11].
  • Agent Authorization Barriers: Honda imposed unreasonable hurdles for consumers attempting to authorize agents to act on their behalf. Consumers were required to directly confirm their authorization with Honda—a practice deemed illegal under CCPA[2][9][12].
  • Failure to Address Global Privacy Control (GPC) Signals: Honda ignored GPC signals, which are designed to allow consumers to opt out of data sharing with a single browser setting[8][13].
  • Contractual Safeguards: The automaker failed to produce contracts with advertising technology companies that included mandatory privacy protections for shared consumer data[3][9].

Settlement Terms and Compliance Measures

Under the settlement agreement, Honda committed to several corrective actions:

  1. Streamlined Privacy Request Processes: Honda will simplify its methods for submitting opt-out and limitation requests. Consumers will no longer need to provide excessive information or confirm agent authorizations directly[2][8][10].
  2. User Experience Design Improvements: A user experience (UX) designer will review Honda’s privacy request submission system to ensure it meets CCPA standards for fairness and simplicity[1][3][13].
  3. Employee Training: Honda will train employees handling privacy requests on CCPA compliance protocols[3][8].
  4. Contract Revisions: The company will revise its agreements with third-party vendors to include necessary privacy safeguards[9][10].
  5. Certification and Monitoring: Honda must certify its compliance with these measures and provide evidence of implementation[8][10].

Implications for Businesses

Honda’s case underscores the importance of prioritizing consumer privacy rights and adhering strictly to legal requirements. Here are some lessons businesses can draw from this enforcement action:

  • Simplify Privacy Processes: Ensure that consumers can exercise their rights without unnecessary hurdles or excessive data collection.
  • Design for Symmetry: Privacy tools must offer equal ease for opting in and opting out of data sharing.
  • Respect GPC Signals: Companies should integrate mechanisms that honor global opt-out signals.
  • Train Employees: Staff responsible for handling privacy requests must be adequately trained on compliance standards.
  • Review Contracts: All agreements with third-party vendors should include explicit provisions protecting consumer data.

A Broader Wake-Up Call

The CPPA’s action against Honda highlights growing regulatory scrutiny in the realm of consumer privacy. As more states adopt comprehensive privacy laws, businesses must reassess their practices and ensure they align with evolving legal standards. Failure to do so risks financial penalties, reputational damage, and loss of consumer trust.

Honda’s settlement is not just a cautionary tale—it is a call to action for all organizations handling personal data. Privacy compliance must be treated as an integral part of business operations rather than an afterthought.

Honda vs CCPA - The Future Outlook

Honda agreed to implement several specific changes as part of its settlement with the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) to address alleged violations of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). These changes aim to simplify consumer privacy rights processes, ensure compliance with the law, and improve data protection practices. Below are the key measures Honda committed to:

1. Streamlined Privacy Request Processes

  • Honda must revise its methods for submitting opt-out and limitation requests, ensuring consumers only provide the minimum information necessary to process these requests, such as eliminating the requirement for excessive personal data like vehicle identification numbers (VINs) for opt-out requests13.
  • The company is required to separate mechanisms for submitting "verifiable" requests (e.g., access, correction, deletion) from non-verifiable opt-out and limitation requests4.

2. Symmetrical Privacy Choices

  • Honda must redesign its cookie management platform to ensure symmetry between opting in and opting out. This includes adding a "Reject All" button alongside the existing "Allow All" button, making it equally easy for consumers to opt out of data tracking14.
  • The company must eliminate multi-step processes for opting out of cookies while maintaining simple one-click options for opting in3.

3. Improved Handling of Authorized Agent Requests

  • Honda is prohibited from requiring consumers to directly confirm their authorization when an agent submits opt-out or limitation requests on their behalf. Instead, authorized agents will need to provide their own contact information along with the consumer's4.

4. Global Privacy Control (GPC) Recognition

  • Honda must update its systems to recognize and comply with GPC signals, which allow consumers to opt out of data sharing through browser settings14.

5. Enhanced User Experience Design

  • Honda is required to consult a user experience (UX) designer to evaluate and improve its privacy rights submission tools, ensuring they are user-friendly and compliant with CCPA standards46.

6. Employee Training on CCPA Compliance

  • All personnel responsible for handling privacy requests must undergo updated training on CCPA requirements and best practices46.

7. Strengthened Contract Management

  • Honda must revise its contracts with third-party vendors and advertising technology companies to include mandatory CCPA provisions that limit data use and protect consumer privacy. The company is also required to maintain proper documentation of these agreements36.

8. Annual Metrics Reporting

  • For five years, Honda will publish annual metrics related to CCPA requests on its website, providing transparency about how consumer privacy rights are being exercised and handled4.

These changes are designed not only to bring Honda into compliance with the CCPA but also to set a precedent for other businesses handling consumer data. The case highlights the importance of creating fair, transparent, and accessible privacy processes while adhering strictly to regulatory requirements.

Citations:
[1] https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/privacy-protection/1605000/dechert-cyber-bits-issue-73-march-27-2025
[2] https://cppa.ca.gov/announcements/2025/20250312.html
[3] https://www.hunton.com/privacy-and-information-security-law/cppa-fines-honda-632-500-for-ccpa-violations
[4] https://cybernews.com/privacy/6-examples-of-online-privacy-violation/
[5] https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-imposes-5-billion-penalty-sweeping-new-privacy-restrictions-facebook
[6] https://internet.exchangepoint.tech/you-have-data-rights-so-why-are-they-so-hard-to-exercise/
[7] https://www.automotivedive.com/news/honda-fined-632k-data-privacy-california-ccpa-consumer-act/743728/
[8] https://www.clarkhill.com/news-events/news/honda-settles-with-cppa-over-privacy-violations-automaker-to-change-business-practices-and-pay-632500-fine/
[9] https://www.wsgrdataadvisor.com/2025/03/lessons-from-the-cppas-632500-settlement-with-connected-vehicle-manufacturer/
[10] https://www.zwillgen.com/privacy/cppa-settles-with-honda-over-alleged-privacy-violations/
[11] https://natlawreview.com/article/what-hondas-ccpa-penalty-means-your-privacy-compliance
[12] https://www.clearycyberwatch.com/2025/03/cppa-enforcement-action-against-honda-underscores-need-for-ccpa-compliant-privacy-practices/
[13] https://infotrust.com/articles/honda-ccpa-settlement-key-takeaways-for-privacy-professionals/
[14] https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/privacy-protection/1604294/california-privacy-enforcement-update-verifying-consumer-requests-and-banners-must-be-symmetrical
[15] http://www.peteraclarke.com.au/2025/03/31/california-privacy-protection-agency-v-honda-settlement-with-honda-paying-632500-fine-for-breaching-california-consumer-privacy-act-by-requiring-excessive-personal-information-making-it-difficult/
[16] https://www.insideprivacy.com/ccpa/honda-settles-cppa-allegations-regarding-california-consumer-privacy-act-violations/
[17] https://cppa.ca.gov/regulations/pdf/20250307_hmc_order.pdf
[18] https://www.wiley.law/alert-Key-Takeaways-from-the-California-Privacy-Agencys-First-CCPA-Enforcement-Action
[19] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/honda-fined-632k-violating-california-105200371.html
[20] https://www.polsinelli.com/gregory-j-leighton/publications/what-hondas-ccpa-penalty-means-for-your-privacy-compliance
[21] https://www.jdsupra.com/topics/honda/data-protection/california-privacy-protection-agency-cppa/
[22] https://www.clarkhill.com/news-events/news/honda-settles-with-cppa-over-privacy-violations-automaker-to-changes-business-practices-and-pay-632500-fine/
[23] https://lokker.com/common-data-privacy-challenges/
[24] https://www.didomi.io/blog/10-ways-brands-inadvertently-violate-privacy-laws
[25] https://votiro.com/blog/the-impact-of-the-american-privacy-act-on-consumer-rights/
[26] https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/11/15/americans-and-privacy-concerned-confused-and-feeling-lack-of-control-over-their-personal-information/
[27] https://dataprivacymanager.net/5-biggest-gdpr-fines-so-far-2020/
[28] https://www.clarip.com/blog/understanding-us-data-privacy-law-fines/
[29] https://skills4good.ai/resources/top-five-challenges-businesses-face-with-data-privacy
[30] https://termly.io/resources/articles/data-privacy-issues/
[31] https://epic.org/issues/data-protection/enforcement-of-privacy-laws/
[32] https://www.osano.com/articles/privacy-team-challenges
[33] https://www.techtarget.com/searchdatamanagement/feature/Top-3-data-privacy-challenges-and-how-to-address-them
[34] https://www.pierceatwood.com/alerts/enforcing-us-consumer-data-privacy-laws-part-3-private-litigation-and-arbitration
[35] https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2025/03/13/california-privacy-agency-fines-american-honda-over-consumer-data-violations/
[36] https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/avoiding-ccpa-privacy-pitfalls-lessons-from-the-honda-settlement-order/
[37] https://captaincompliance.com/education/honda-settles-with-cppa-over-privacy-violations/
[38] https://natlawreview.com/article/california-privacy-agency-extracts-civil-penalties-its-first-settlement-not
[39] https://www.goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/blogs/2025/03/california-privacy-agency-signals-stronger-ccpa-enforcement-in-settlement-with-honda
[40] https://www.bassberry.com/news/cppa-investigation-honda-privacy/
[41] https://www.truevault.com/learn/cppa-settles-privacy-case-with-honda-for-630k
[42] https://www.datagrail.io/blog/data-privacy/honda-settles-with-cppa-a-wake-up-call-for-automakers-on-privacy-practices/
[43] https://www.stblaw.com/about-us/publications/view/2025/03/20/california-regulator-fines-honda-$632-500-for-privacy-violations
[44] https://www.repairerdrivennews.com/2025/03/18/honda-to-pay-632500-fine-for-california-privacy-act-violations/
[45] https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/state-of-privacy-laws-in-us/
[46] https://www.dlapiperdataprotection.com/?t=law&c=US
[47] https://www.privacyworld.blog/2024/08/are-data-practice-risk-assessments-at-risk-in-the-us/
[48] https://epic.org/issues/consumer-privacy/social-media-privacy/
[49] https://www.osano.com/articles/data-privacy-laws
[50] https://complyauto.com/2025/03/14/honda-fined-632500-for-privacy-violations-dealer-lessons-from-hondas-faulty-cookie-banner/

Read more

Beyond Reaction: Integrating Incident Response into Your Cybersecurity Risk Management Strategy with NIST SP 800-61r3

Beyond Reaction: Integrating Incident Response into Your Cybersecurity Risk Management Strategy with NIST SP 800-61r3

In today's dynamic threat landscape, cybersecurity incidents are an unfortunate reality for organizations of all sizes and sectors. The ability to effectively handle these events is no longer a siloed IT function but a critical component of overall cybersecurity risk management. Integrating incident response recommendations and considerations throughout

By Compliance Hub